Nobody? Yeah, thought so. 2020's been one big dry spell for us, fuck this year.

>>1490 I didn't wanna be the one to bring the negativity in but I haven't been allowed to travel far enough to visit my bf since lockdown. I wish we had moved in together before this year started. Or that some other girl had so I could hear about it!

>>1492 That’s awful! At least my bf and I live together so that’s a blessing to count. I hope you’re allowed to see your man in person soon, Anon. Were you actively doing cuckqueaning before the pandemic? >Or that some other girl had so I could hear about it! Cuckqueaning by telepresence! Or, if you’re in a different timezone, cuckqueaning by video drop! Can’t sniff him or clean him up afterwards though. Aside: There are probably some good stories to be had with the long-distance restriction as a conceit.

>>1490 Truly, we've all been cucked by Corona-chan. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVCQa0znGpM

I dunno. This year's been pretty stressful. I get cuckiest when I'm horny, happy, and relaxed, and I haven't been able to be any of those things recently. Sorry to bring things down. >When was the last time you were cucked? Last year! Hubby chatted up a nice girl he met by chance and then had a one-night stand with her a few days later. >Have you had a favourite vixen? Has your man had a favourite vixen? I think one of our first few was my favourite. She was a sweet, considerate, petite girl but drifted off after a while in search of a bf of her own. >Does cuckqueaning mean Compersion or Humiliation for you? 100% compersion for me! Humiliation turns me off but I think if you're into it then you should enjoy it. >How close do you like to be when they're in the act? Same room. I like being able to watch the show and dote on them. If I'm not there then I like it when I get messages with little updates. I love knowing when he's about to commence, and when he's coming home. It keeps me involved, as a cuckquean rather than a bystander. >Have any of your girlfriends slept with your man? Do you think it's a good idea for them to do it? Yes! But no, the girlfriend in question got all weird after that and we're no longer friends. I guess she couldn't handle it. So it's something you should only do if you're able to and they're able to. >Do you have any post-cucking rituals once you're alone with your man again? Apart from fucking? I like to slowly clean him with my mouth while I remember what I saw, or while he tells me about the fun he had.

>>1496 Before the lockdowns happened I had just managed to convince him to do it once, with an ex he was friends-with-benefits with after they had broken up. I only got to listen because she wasn't comfortable with being watched, which was disappointing because I had made myself a cozy closet space to creep on them from! But I got him to give me a rundown about how different her body was. (I'm pretty slender in all respects, which he likes, but she's curvy and jiggly, which he also likes. Can't have both in the same woman, so therefore gotta have two women, right? It's logic!) I did smell him after and I didn't really get her scent, because she wears some earthy rose perfume, so that's what I smelled on him. It was nice. I can't decide if asking her for the name of it would be weird. As for cleanup, I don't really like the taste of the condoms. It's not as bad as latex but it's not palatable either. To further answer the OP's questions, I'm mostly compersive but sometimes I have subby moods where some humiliation is nice. I also just like him taking another women because it shows that my man is desirable to other women, but he's mine, which I guess is a dominant mood if anything? idk lol, I just like thinking of him as my stud that women want. >>1500 Corona-chan is cute. I wish she wasn't such a bitch to me. I'm not submissive enough for this treatment. :c

>>1512 >I only got to listen because she wasn't comfortable with being watched A lot of other girls really aren't comfortable with this sort of thing. Fair enough! Gotta be considerate of our vixens. Some have apparently freaked all the way out at the concept of my endorsing my man's cock in them even though they're happy to take a piece of him if they think I don't know about it. Silly! What was it like to only be able to listen? I've never done it that way. I've only been able to watch a few times, which was amazing, but I've come to find that I'm quite comfortable with it happening somewhere else as long as I get regular updates. How did olde-time cuckqueans cope without modern messaging? Were sealed letters dispatched from the tryst-chamber to the lady of the house's bedroom on a silver tray, paper scented with a light dusting of illicit love sweat? >I had made myself a cozy closet space to creep on them from! That's such a good idea. How did you set it up? In my deep dark moments I have a fantasy of being put away into a cozy little hollowed-out space under the bed with a comfy beanbag to curl up on and some other creature comforts while I happily listen to everything going on above. You know those clips when cats and dogs interfere with people having sex? In my fantasy they have to put me away because I'd be like that if I was allowed to roam free, just clambering all over the place and sticking my nose in and licking all over like a goddamn nuisance. >I also just like him taking another women because it shows that my man is desirable to other women, but he's mine, which I guess is a dominant mood if anything? idk lol, I just like thinking of him as my stud that women want. Yes! Thank you! This is exactly it. Many people don't seem to understand that being a cuckquean can be all about big smug. Not only is my man (MY man) having a great time dicking another woman into a puddle but then he comes back to me and dicks me into a happy puddle every time, and then we go about our lives together. For me it's less about the other women wanting him and more that I just love it when he fucks. Doesn't have to be me he's fucking, gets me off just the same! I wonder if flavoured condoms are flavoured on the inside too? Someone should make condoms designed to not leave bad-tasting residue, or lube that counteracts it.

>>1515 >Some have apparently freaked all the way out at the concept of my endorsing my man's cock in them even though they're happy to take a piece of him if they think I don't know about it. Silly! Something my man and I agree on is that we don't want/trust anyone who is ok with plain old infidelity. Our cuckqueaning is not infidelity to my mind, despite the name - it is still a consensual agreement between us. I might fantasize about being cheated on for real, when I get in a really submissive mood, but it's only a fantasy. I usually don't even like it as kink talk. >What was it like to only be able to listen? I've never done it that way. I've only been able to watch a few times, which was amazing, but I've come to find that I'm quite comfortable with it happening somewhere else as long as I get regular updates. I've never been as stimulated by sound as by sight or scent - like historically after a couple months with a new bf I stop caring for phone sex for example - so my imagination was doing a significant amount of work. It was still hot, I still came a bunch, but I don't know how sustainable this is. On the other hand, my man told me whatever I wanted to know afterward and proved pretty good at pushing my buttons for a first time, so maybe that will be enough. Maybe I'm worrying too much about sustainability for something that might not happen that often even after Corona-chan is put to bed. >That's such a good idea. How did you set it up? In my deep dark moments I have a fantasy of being put away into a cozy little hollowed-out space under the bed with a comfy beanbag to curl up on and some other creature comforts while I happily listen to everything going on above. You know those clips when cats and dogs interfere with people having sex? In my fantasy they have to put me away because I'd be like that if I was allowed to roam free, just clambering all over the place and sticking my nose in and licking all over like a goddamn nuisance. That is a mental image. Thanks for the giggles. Honestly figured this was just a common idea. He has solid opaque sliding doors on his closet so I just had an old body pillow against the wall to lean my upper body against. It's not the most comfortable turning my head almost 90 degrees to see out the crack but I thought it'd be worth it to get a closer view. bf gives good neck rubs anyway. But plan B was reclining against the corner of the closet. If I just face the closet door I end up having to open it too much and I might as well just be in the room with them at that point. Also had a floor blanket that I don't mind washing body fluids off of. And my little vibey egg toy. And some bottled water. Hydration is important! The water is the only part of this setup that ended up being used lol.

>>1519 >Something my man and I agree on is that we don't want/trust anyone who is ok with plain old infidelity. That's very wise. Now that I think about it, all of our vixens were either fully aware of me from the start or wholly unaware of me. I think the ones who think they can get my man to cheat on me squick him out. Only the ones who were fully aware of me ended up becoming regular lays; the ones wholly unaware of me were but one night stands. I much prefer the ones who are aware of and comfortable with me since I like being friendly with them, going out for breakfast the morning after, that sort of thing. >Our cuckqueaning is not infidelity to my mind, despite the name - it is still a consensual agreement between us. I might fantasize about being cheated on for real, when I get in a really submissive mood, but it's only a fantasy. I usually don't even like it as kink talk. It's so nice to see someone else who feels this way about it! The thought of being cheated on is still a very unhappy and distressing one for me. I think the closest I get in fantasy is my man preparing a new girl in secret so he can fuck her as a surprise gift for me. You hit the nail when you referred to it as "our" cuckqueaning, because that's really what it is. My man's not going off to sow wild oats because he'd cheat on me anyway - he wouldn't - but rather because I want him to. (Lots of early cuckqueaning comprised women who seemed to be post-fact rationalising being cheated on and abused; they lay claim to the title as a hardcore humiliation thing and excluded compersive cuckqueans as not-real-cuckqueans.) I remember a time our first vixen was spread-eagled face down on the bed making choked moan-whimpers with her fists full of sheet while my man pounded her, and he looked up and into my eyes before giving the happiest "isn't this awesome?" grin, and in that moment I just felt so connected and intimate with him. That's cuckqueaning! >Maybe I'm worrying too much about sustainability for something that might not happen that often even after Corona-chan is put to bed. Lots of outsiders misunderstand this sort of thing as a hedonic treadmill (though I've met enough burned-out degenerate BDSM high-chasers and porn addicts to know where the general image comes from), but in my experience it hasn't been a problem. You should expect that the raw punch of novelty will fade over time into happy familiarity. Listening to it or hearing about it afterwards isn't the same as watching it directly, but have their own flavours to be learned and appreciated. But if you find that you need their sex to be within eyeshot to properly enjoy it then that's something you should insist upon! No point to this if you don't enjoy it. Those who approach cuckqueaning as novel high-chasing are going to be disappointed in the long run. After a while you come to know how it all goes, like a favourite amusement park ride or special recipe, but in some ways that makes it more enjoyable. Not every cucking will make your insides molten and turn you on so hard you think your soul's going to fall out of your body. There are bumps and scrapes and pitfalls along the way, too, so the usual tired old advice about sensible self-awareness and communication applies quadruply, but for me it's turned out very well. >Honestly figured this was just a common idea. It's a time-honoured cliché for a reason! I've never done it, personally, but that's only because vixens who've been comfortable being watched have also been comfortable doing it with me right there in the room. I think if I retired to the closet they'd have freaked out a little.

Vixen leaving lipstick, bites, sex-scratches or other marks on your man: Yes or no?

>>1585 I think it's appropriate that marks him as her sexual territory.

>>1585 YES! I love finding evidence. Sex-scratches is a no though, I don't like it when my bf gets hurt because then I fuss, lol >>1592 If lipstick marks him as her territory then why's he coming home to hilt in me right afterward? Checkmate! Seriously though, don't really like the whole "he belongs to the vixen now" play.

The takeaway from this thread is that Corona-chan has cucked all of us.

>How did olde-time cuckqueans cope without modern messaging? Were sealed letters dispatched from the tryst-chamber to the lady of the house's bedroom on a silver tray, paper scented with a light dusting of illicit love sweat? morse code. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_telegraphy

>>1695 >"Oh NO! I can't believe I'm being META-CUCKED by the plague egregore CORONA-CHAN!"

Before we were in a pandemic, how the fuck did you all used to find vixens? Did you involve your thirsty friends like >>1511 did or tap his exes like >>1512 or go on OkCupid or what? I'm not good at social stuff normally and sometimes I hate people but I still want to be involved in the "hunt".

>>1725 We went out to BDSM munches and socialised. I found him a couple of girls that way once by striking up conversations with other female subs and warming them up for him. Be aware that even in the supposedly famously open-minded kink community you're unlikely to find anyone who actually gets cuckqueaning, and there is a chance that creepy dudes will treat "I already have a boyfriend and Master" as more of a suggestion/challenge. Ugh. Corona-chan has killed munches dead in most places but they might start up one day. If you aren't good at it but still want to feel involved or like you're cheering him on, then try training yourself to be aware of other girls, check them out on his behalf, and point out to him ones that you think he'd like. Two sets of eyes are better than one. This assumes you can go out with him, which in some places still isn't possible. One time when we were still experimenting with the idea I paid for my man to see a higher-end escort and helped him research it. It doesn't give you the full "punch" but it was okay as training wheels. Only applies if you live in a place where the sex trade doesn't consist entirely of those who are trafficked, STI-ridden, worn-out, or all three. Never tried dating sites. He had some success with Tindr, so if you're okay with an Israeli company capturing rich analytics on you/your bf's attraction analytics and preferentially trying to match him with races different to him, I guess you could try. You can help figure out what photos of him to use or take new ones. You could even swipe on his behalf if you want to be more directly involved. We found that being upfront about his girlfriend wanting him to fuck other girls had a strongly negative effect on Tindr matches. I advise against thirsty friends unless you're one hundred thousand percent sure it won't get weird and/or leak out wrong into your social circles (not fair for him to get a rep as a cheater because you told him to cheat), and I advise against exes for the same reason. I hear hatefucking exes is a thing though so who knows, maybe it'll work. If you do contact one of his exes on his behalf and ask them to fuck him then absolutely come back here and tell us how it went, I could use a chuckle.

Does anyone else kinda miss the cuckqueaning blogs on pre-purge Tumblr? It was nice to see the fetish getting written about honestly. Post-purge it all kind of died, with only the porn spamming left.

>>1870 >Tinder is Israeli >Developed in LA California >Owned by a Dallas Texas company you guys really just say Israeli over everything don't you

>>2155 Strange, I could have sworn I read articles about how Tinder's parent company's parent company was incorporated in Israel. Perhaps it was that one of the co-founders was Jewish? In any case, they are on record as saying that they consider "sexual racism" (i.e. white woman having a preference for white men and vice-versa) a problem on the platform and promote inter-racial pairings to try and "fix" it.

>>2156 Given how the "Israeli" claim went, I think a source for the "sexual racism" quote is in order?

>>2159 Got anything to do with actual cuckqueaning?

>>2155 >>2156 Maybe you’re thinking of this? https://jewishjournal.com/mobile_20111212/132669/ >Meet the Jewish founders of Tinder Given the murky chains of ownership one often finds in large VC and holding companies I wouldn’t be surprised if some of the Match group chains back to Israel or otherwise Jewish ownership, but whether this is exceptional is a different story. As for the sexual racism thing, Tinder vehemently denies that they account for race but they also invested heavily in machine learning for photo analysis a few years ago amid a general atmosphere in which many articles decrying sexual racism appeared. I also vaguely recall something about that. Grindr (owned by the same group) put out a press release after the George Floyd unrest saying they were disabling their ethnicity filter: https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/grindr-remove-ethnicity-filter-support-black-lives-matter-n1221936 I also vaguely recall information on Tinder encouraging cross-racial matching such as https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/katienotopoulos/tinder-users-are-most-open-to-interracial (yeah yeah Buzzfeed sue me, it cites its sources) >Tinder Says It Is Really Into Interracial Love >Tinder says it helps users date outside their race >part of a campaign by the company petitioning the Unicode Consortium to include interracial couple emojis. "Love is universal, and it’s time for interracial couples to be represented in our universal language," Tinder said on the campaign page. >A 2017 study by Cornell University showed that dating apps like Tinder increase interracial marriage rates Can’t find anything on them actually taking action in terms of their algorithm but they campaigned pretty hard for that interracial emoji thing, so that might be where the impression comes from. But far more alarming is this dysgenic nightmare I just stumbled on: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/katienotopoulos/finally-theres-a-dating-app-just-for-verified-twitter-users >Finally, There's A Dating App Just For Verified Twitter Users >Loveflutter is a swiping dating app that links up to your Twitter and shows your tweets in your profile (egads). Now the company is launching a new feature called "Blue" that allows verified Twitter users to browse and match with only other users with blue check marks. >The premium verified-only feature will be free for the first 1,000 people to sign up in each city, but after that you'll need a monthly subscription to access it.

Found on the @EGirlsPostingLs twitter account (although to us it would be a W).

>>2163 Oh... oh my...

>>2163 Found this one there, also.

seeing as this is the general thread, what are your thoughts of using paid girls? acceptable or does it only get you off if you/your man is able to get them into bed with only your charm and wit?

>>2172 I should think it doesn't even get to the point of whether it appeals to the fetish or not. Going to a hooker is kind of gross and risks him catching something.

>>2172 My opinion is in >>1870 >One time when we were still experimenting with the idea I paid for my man to see a higher-end escort and helped him research it. It doesn't give you the full "punch" but it was okay as training wheels. Only applies if you live in a place where the sex trade doesn't consist entirely of those who are trafficked, STI-ridden, worn-out, or all three. It was okay as a "am I okay with him having sex with other girls" trial but I wouldn't get off to my man seeing hookers, no way. Nothing sexy about it and the majority of the sex trade in most places is pretty damn sketchy. He doesn't particularly enjoy it either. I dunno, maybe if there was a kind of escort who specialized in having sex that was fun to watch we might consider being customers. Maybe humiliation-type queans might enjoy using professional dommes who specialize in humiliating them? I can't see it working, personally. Side note: I bet Corona-chan's savaged the sex industry pretty bad, what with Onlyfans and camsites reducing online sex work to a power law distribution worldwide-competition hell.

>>2176 Are those images trying to claim that Onlyfans is somehow at fault becuase some of its posters are more popular than others? Of course a small portion of content creators are going to be wildly popular, that's the case with everything ever. They throw around words like "unequal" as if there's some reason every e-whore should make the same amount of money. Should Onlyfans disallow users the choice of who to support and instead forcibly assign fans to each girl so that they all get the same number? These creators are essentialy selling a product, some will always sell better than others. Don't get me wrong, Onlyfans is a blight on humanity, but they're not doing anything wrong in that specific way.

>>2177 The images point out that sales made through OnlyFans follow a classic "winner takes all"/power law distribution like any most online "creator" economies and that the "I just bought (and didn't totally rent for an hour) this suspiciously AirBnB-like home with OnlyFans money, you should sign up to sell pics of your butthole through my referral link so I collect a cut of your paltry sales" posts that flood Twitter etc. are unlikely to be genuine projections of earning power. >They throw around words like "unequal" as if there's some reason every e-whore should make the same amount of money. Should Onlyfans disallow users the choice of who to support and instead forcibly assign fans to each girl so that they all get the same number? Jesus, Anon, calm down. They're using the word "unequal" in a factual sense, not a pejorative one.

>>2177 From what I understand OnlyFans started out trying to be a competitor to Patreon, it's the thots that chose OnlyFans not really a conscious effort by OnlyFans My bet is it probably started when Patreon banned porn creators because of a US law that made websites liable for sex work organised on their platforms, OnlyFans is UK based so would be safe from it,