>>11158 as a frequenter of 4pol, im pretty dang goddamn sure ive seen that exact same thread template on there more than once and everytime it was posted most of the comments were users just calling it out.

>>11211 I searched the 4plebs archive and nothing showed up and I had posted a link to that search in the thread, it has never appeared on 4chan at all at least not on /pol/. >>11168 No the thread itself was suspicious not the deletion of it, I half expected it to be deleted but I get how you misunderstood me there.

Moved to /monarchia/. https://9chan.tw/monarchia/catalog Sad news is PDFs don't work there.

>>11598 Nice, I’ll be sure to check it out

>>11199 First cause is insufficient

>>11480 >For non-fiction I'd have to recommend 'For My Legionaries'. All throughout you can really feel a fascist spirit running through it that you just can't help but respect. I was very impressed at several moments by Codreanu's bravery, his integrity and many other facets of his personality and conduct. You really follow their struggles against Jewry and the Jew-controlled government through the book, and the end is likely to give one the feels with the final culmination of all the injustices made against Codreanu and his Iron Guard. I just finished reading For My Legionaries and your description is spot on. It is a beautiful book. I started to cry near the end. I highly recommenced it.

>>7215 >When you say you've read his latest book, do you mean 'Anti-Tech Revolution: Why and How?' or do you mean the newest edition of 'Technological Slavery' that came out earlier this year? Does anyone have a pdf of the new edition?

>>11657 Fuck, there's a new version of that book too? It looks like there's at least 30 more pages than the original too. >>11656 >I started to cry near the end. I really got the feels as well. I don't blame you, anon. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqfU_CeNBSE

Does anyone have a pdf of The Last Will of a Russian Fascist, it seems that it is very hard to find,

IronMarch: Next Leap PDF >>11663 I've seen someone ask for that before, I think. I've never been able to find it either, unfortunately. Just looked again too.

>>11755 The Greeks already perfected and talked about almost everything worth talking about. It's unironically been pretty much downhill from there.

>>11756 >The Greeks already perfected and talked about almost everything worth talking about. Like what?

>>11760 Sex and war. And sex.

>>11755 Libs and reacs can corrupt anything with their warped optics. Is it surprising when leftists can spin effin Nietzsche in all directions?

>>11760 Philosophy, art, epic literature, drama, etc. >>11781 Nietzsche's easier to spin than you'd think. He's important and everyone here should read him, but his focus on perspectives and immoralism make him easily adaptable.

>>11673 Well, I certainly don't see hippy-like ideas of love winning us back our nations, so maybe you are right. A Völkisch love as expounded by Hitler is the type of love that would do anything to help one's own flesh and blood

>>11632 >Not sure if naive All became extremely relative. Today, even thinking that your shit and niggers share the same color is absolutely forbidden. >>11685 And so we see that He was right.

>>11726 >even thinking that your shit and niggers share the same color is absolutely forbidden. Then what are we supposed to think once the blinds are off?

>>11730 >Then what are we supposed to think once the blinds are off? 14 88

>>11783 We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children, because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.

What do we think about monks? I have some double-think regarding them. I somewhat agree with the view that locking up thousands of intelligent men in monasteries never to reproduce could be bad for the race, but I also admire monks and asceticism in many respects. Mount Athos, for example, seems so quiet, simple and comfy. I've read that in some Asian countries though, traditionally young men would spend some time in monasteries for a period of their life, most moving on. I think something like that could do society well.

>>11593 monks/priests form the core of a religious community, and serve a valuable purpose in perpetuating tradition. there's also the concept that religious life/holy orders is supposed to be a major commitment, and having a family alongside that would lead to 'divided loyalties' so to speak. at the same time, this produces a dysgenic effect. perhaps some compromise could be figured out.

Here is an interesting cap from smug's /tg/ about Roman religion and magic. It's written with RPGs in mind but still has a lot of information anons ITT may find interesting. Of note is the bit about Genius, the divinity inside all men.

>>11203 Making contact with the old gods is dead simple, as long as you know where to look.

>>11735 that looks like some aleister crowley satanic jew magic shit i aint touching any of that.

Interesting in Hinduism but how would a convert choose between Vaishnavism and Shivism

>>11762 I've read an interesting thing that said that there are basically three primary spiritual paths (tri-marga) in Vedic spirituality >Vaishnava-marga >Shaiva-marga >Shakta-marga The different paths have different goals. From how I've seen it explained, the Vaishnava path has the highest goal in its sight, i.e. ultimate communion with the Absolute Supreme Godhead. The Shaiva path apparently is aimed at achieving an isolated realization of the internal self as atman, while the Shakta path is more focused on the material and the energies flowing through it. A Vaishnava wrote this description though, so others may disagree, but I thought it was an interesting approach to the internal diversity of Hinduism that went a long way to reconciling many of the differences. It would depend on what your goal is, it seems.

>>11630 U serious? 12, she has barely started maturing. 14, she's still not there yet. 16-22, or perhaps 18-20, is truly the peak. On average people start ageing at 24 or 25, but a girl's body is fully shaped around 18 although some achieve this at 16 years of age.

>>11786 A Womans fertility peaks at 14 and she is more than capable of having a child as early as ten with no issues as it happens quite frequently all over the world, quit buying into bullshit jewish science you fucking nigger.

>>11794 dude im not fucking anything that young though, and i would second guess the humanity of someone that would. i think later sexual maturity is a sign of a more advanced species/culture.

>>11720 >He's one guy...and the NS never could pass polygamy within Germany, so double stupid. Himmler was extremely influential within the Third Reich. Being involved with the SS as he was, even more important. Hitler foresaw that the SS would, within a few generations, produce the leadership of the Reich. You have some meek version of the Third Reich in your mind. If they had won the war they would have radically changed German society. There's a reason why the issue with the churches was deliberately postponed after the initial failures of the Reich church, or why Hitler, according to Goebbels, put off the meat problem as well

monogamy fags here just dont have any good arguments and they never address the valid points brought up by someone arguing for polygamy.

Monogamy for most (97% of people), polygamy for the best. And temple of pussy for the king.

>>11789 It won't happen. You can argue all you want but it's a fantasy and won't sustain a civilization that can compete with others. You are living in a fantasy in your head.

>>11792 thats what i think would be best. polygamy for the common man isnt mathematically practical nor is it in line with the natural dynamics used to justify the practice. >>11797 >It won't happen. not an argument words heard by many a great man who has changed the world before. >You can argue all you want i can and have been, im just waiting for camp monogamy to (actually) argue back. >it's a fantasy >You are living in a fantasy in your head. not an argument. >won't sustain a civilization that can compete with others this seemed like the beginning of an argument, but you never delivered on it beyond an initial statement. can you elaborate more on this part?

>>11162 Right, but I remain skeptical of "constitutional monsrchism", constitutions are something that really have no power, but only serve as a reminder of what those in a state should do and I doubt a group of royalists and fascist would ever get along unless those royalists are like fascist themselves.

>>11159 That was the one downside I perceived too. It's very unfortunate that they moved away from absolutism. It could be much worse though. I don't follow Bhutan really that closely, but we'd know that they were heading down the globohomo route completely if they started allowing many more tourists in, or if they removed the dress and architecture mandates. An even further sidelining of the king would be a bad sign too. Assuming this guy doesn't further erode his own position, he'll be king until around 2045, when he'll be mandated to retire. We can only hope his son wouldn't come to the throne and further (((liberalize))) things. It's also worth noting that the Nepalese monarchy was abolished the same year, which led to the Maoists coming to power there. I wonder if it is a coincidence that when the king of Bhutan came to power in the same year he instituted slight reforms. One reason could be to stave off communist influences and nip them in the bud.

>>11166 I'm positively growing used to the idea that an old school monarchy and an enlightened fascism can actually work hand in hand. Reading Evola totally comes to my mind in terms of what a perfect fusion of both would be. I think the old divide will have to take a back seat and those who, ironically, cannot adapt will just have to be forgotten. The main problem seem to be King vs State, or is there something deeper?

>>11166 The thing here is, that constitutional monarchism doesn't have to be constitutional it can be simply a monarchy but with a parliment or council and the ideas of democracy can be left out for a fascist form of government. >>11188 >I think the old divide will have to take a back seat and those who, ironically, cannot adapt will just have to be forgotten. This, I've always supported a royalism fascism kicking out all the reactionary bullshit in favour of classical philosophies and fascist philosophies. There are very few Christian and fedual philsophies I support which come from men like Michaveli.

I'm not going out on a crutch here when I say that horror anime tends to filter out a lot of the emololipedo shit.

>>11777 If /xpol/ is based, /xfascist/ will be even better.

asha logos bitchute channel has a series about this, its more of a brief primer than anykind of comprehensive conclusive explanation. highly reccomend it.

>>11778 >Some Chinese monolithic tombs have engravings which bear a striking similarity with the Norse artistic style. Can you give me some examples, also I found this on Twatter. https://nitter.net/xujnx/status/1259364705853997056

>>11774 >lotsa Aryan DNA Genghis Khan >fucking mong rice blood Kublai Khant

>>11790 Damn I wish but if I ever cross the path of these pics I'll point to them here. Meanwhile, a look into ancient Chinese tombs with monolithic architecture might yield interesting results.

Be sure to check out Twilight of the Idols by Nietzsche sometime soon. It's fairly short and was basically intended by Nietzsche to be an introduction to his stuff if I recall correctly. Although it's a short book, it really covers a lot of ground, and though I've only read Beyond Good and Evil and Antichrist alongside this work, so far it's my favorite one. I'm hoping to start Genealogy here soon. I've been reading a bit of Schopenhauer here lately myself. I was able to get both volumes of The World as Will and Representation for fairly cheap, and so far I've been reading a lot out of the second volume. I'm less concerned with the metaphysics at this point than I am with his talk of life-affirming and life-denying religions, the idea of the Will to Live, and many of his descriptions of Nature throughout, which he basically describes as eternal struggle and suffering. For the book as a whole though, it's one of those I'll probably have to read more before I can truly come back and understand all of it. Hitler was a big Schopenhauer fan, but he rejected his pessimism.

>>11707 >Schopenhauer I heard about him a lot of we had a discussion about what he saw as life-affirming and denying in a thread, but I never got to read and understand his works. Is there any book you would recommend from him?

>>11709 If you want a good taste of Schopenhauer, check out the Penguin Classics selection "Essays and Aphorisms". That is the first thing that I read from him. The book touches on a lot of stuff, such as religion, suffering, suicide, women and the like. I also read "Schopenhauer: A Very Short Introduction". It was a good book. http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=BD8B9DBEEE42009D65203CAC24C17527

your mental outlook is affected by the purity of your mind which begins with the purity of your body. a different level of purity and you get a different philosophy. understanding this, all philosophy becomes relative and thus only purity is the philosophy worth learning.