>According to Mr. Roddy, the decree of the Vatican Council drafted by Jules Isaac “would have gone down early,” but for the “covert help” of the “priest-spy.”
>That seems implausible. It is hard to see how the “priest-spy” could have had the pivotal role attributed to him. When Roncalli, who, under the laws of the Church, was not even a Catholic, slithered onto the See of Rome as John XXIII, his election must have been procured by accomplices in the College of Cardinals, (8) and he almost certainly had in petto a scheme for capturing and Judaizing the Church, probably including the Vatican Council that he convened in 1962 and guided through its intermittent sessions to its consummation of the revolutionary take-over in 1965. Mr. Patterson notes that after Roncalli was elected Pope in 1958, the larger newspapers in this country dropped their neutral or mildly hostile attitude toward the Catholic Church and suddenly blossomed with bouquets for “good Pope John.” The Jewish Lords of the American press must have received from their superiors advice that “Roncalli is our boy.”
>In an address reported by the Rocky Mountain News, 8 October 1982 (reproduced photographically in Christian News) [Malachi Martin] stated explicitly that “The Christian church is decaying, has nothing to say, and is on the way out.” He added that the other great religions of the world, Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, Shintoism, “are headed in the same direction as Christianity and even faster.” He predicted the imposition of “a worldwide religion with one structure and institutions,” managed by “one great bureaucracy. And out of it will emerge the ultimate disaster.”
>What is crucially significant in that speech is that he explicitly affirmed that the Jews’ religion (the basis of their racial unity) is not in the least subject to change or decay and will always endure triumphantly. “It is irradicable, (12) indestructible,” he affirmed, “there is no decay and nothing can destroy the soul of Judaism. (My italics.)
>... but a sheet reproduced from typewriting and of uncertain provenance, enclosed with the copy of his book sent to me, identifies Wojtyia (John Paul II) as a Jew, son of a Kikess named Wanda Katz.
Moreover, when an entire structure is weak, it requires as little as a few men, perhaps a single one, to topple it all.
This is what you deserve by not basing your faith on White racial grounds but instead on a bunch of desert dwellers and carpet dealers. Jews are trying to enucleate Asatru of its Nordic bent, longing to denazify it. In many ways, they seem to succeed, turning it into a multicultural bag of logical fallacies and emotional appeals. In other words, to prevent Whites from uniting at the highest level, that of spirituality based in facts and in the illuminated flesh (the White one, if you didn't follow). Since they can do that with a religious movement that is heavily charged with ethnical overtones, it is absolutely not any surprise that turning the Catholic Church got turned into another blatant Jewish tool as the centuries old form, although useful to some extent to the Jews, proved to be too cumbersome to their world wide Zionist agenda.
This is also why Jews are so vicious in their assymetrical fight against any pro-White organization, secular or religious.
>7. I do not like to see ‘Fifth Column’ used in this sense, a perversion of its original meaning. When the Spanish army was delivering Spain from Judaeo-Communist terror in 1936, General Franco, on whom the command had devolved, remarked that four columns of his troops were converging on Madrid, in which there was a ‘fifth column’ composed of the decent Spaniards in that territory, who, while impotent against the power of the Communist government, necessarily sympathized with the army that was fighting to free them and would assist its efforts whenever they feasibly could. A ‘fifth column,’ therefore, is not composed of traitors, but of patriots held in subjection by an alien power.