>>13531
>Men are inherently pro-ethnicity because they want their children to look the same as them since it makes it easier to identify infidelity.
I think that's a bit of a jump in logic, sure, men want kids that look like them, but that's in regards to infidelity most likely by members of the same group, at best men would be ethno-centric indirectly, simply because it'd be harder to tell if infidelity occurred.
Now i do completely acknowledge that men tend to be more ingroup based than women, but i think that goes beyond reproduction, as again, most men will be more than happy to simply reproduce.
>>13532
>meanwhile women evolved to make use that framework set up by men.
I've heard that it might be the other way around, as in women "pushed" men to develop that framework, unknowingly.
>Then why are you ignoring women's faults and have the inaccurate view that they are anything like men?
I'm not ignoring them, you're missing the point, women can think for themselves, they just reach different conclusions than you because they have a different survival strategy, i myself can't fault them for following their own self interest, instead of being mad about it and pretending they're stupid for not being like us, we should understand what's happening and offer a better alternative.
I do get in many ways why you and others think like that
assuming you are or agree with >>13519 but that doesn't mean that that's correct and as i stated previously it makes us look like the caricatures the mainstream makes of us
i do think many among us embrace those caricatures simply because they want to rebel and not because they have really thought things through which is pretty counter productive.